#Autopano giga 4 trial Pc

That would mean getting a 6800 or I could stick with 32GB and add an M.2 card.

I'm keen to buy soon so a Ryzen 1800 with 64GB RAM doesn't seem like an option.

It is however a known quantity which means there are no problems with (a) stuffing RAM into it and (b) overclocking - should I wish to go that way.

An i7 6800 has only six cores and is ?£400 more expensive.

#Autopano giga 4 trial Pc

(Neither PC Specialist nor OcUK offer this option.) I would have to get an 1800 if I want more than 32GB RAM, but even then it seems that it is not straightforward to configure a system with more than 32GB. That may be too much to ask for but maybe someone will be kind enough to point out any inconsistencies in what I think I know - maybe that will make the choices clearer. What I would like is a small set of specs with difference in price and performance clearly set out. I am tying myself in knots thinking about the choices. (APG is like PS in that you can configure scratch disks.) My budget is max £2500 for CPU, mobo, RAM, M.2 (if used) and graphics card.

With regard to memory, even if I could afford 256GB it isn't clear that would be enough so M.2 strikes me as a possible alternative. So the more cores the better and a higher-end graphics card seems in order. All they will say is 'it uses a lot of multithreading' and I happen to know that in one phase of the process APG uses GPUs where available. Kolor - who make APG - are strangely reluctant to give any advice on what sort of architecture is best for running their program. I have previously had support from Oussebon regarding the problem of editing image files that are over 100GB (and I do mean giga) in size but time has moved on: the spec he posted is no longer valid, the Ryzen has been released and now I want to think about the requirements of APG. I use Photoshop to edit the images produced. My thing is creating gigapixel images using a program called Autopano Giga (or APG).